INDEX BY TITLE

I live in the Midwest which is Big Ten country. Once conference play starts virtually every Big Ten game is televised in my region and I commit myself to try and watch all of them. I have three televisions set up as some games are being played at the same time. I have no bias or affiliation to any Big Ten team as I am a lifelong Notre Dame fan (I include ND games in my viewing schedule as well). My comments and reports are qualified only by my love of the game and an extreme commitment to watching and following Big Ten football.

Saturday, August 26, 2017

joeseddit's PRESEASON PREDICTIONS 2017


EAST
1) - OHIO ST- (9-0) (12-0)
I thought new OC Kevin Wilson was overrated as a Head Coach. Nothing overrated about his offense, though. I mean, the man ran an offense that could put up points against anybody while he was at Indiana. Giving him access to the talent that parades through Columbus just isn’t fair.

2) - PENN ST- (6-3) (8-4)
The reigning champs have a lot returning and consequently, large expectations. I’m not completely sold, though. I love QB Trace McSorley, the kids a winner. Has a lot of swagger. Maybe too much. I know he’s a junior but I’m a expecting a bit of a sophomore jinx from him and most of the team. They’ll be good, just not as good as they might think they are.

3) - MICHIGAN- (6-3) (9-3)
The Wolverines lost a lot of starters, but hey, it’s Michigan. That means something now that Harbaugh is in charge. It wouldn’t surprise me if Michigan does better than I’m projecting, but it wouldn’t take long to find the three tough spots I’m seeing on the schedule.

4) - MICHIGAN ST- (4-5) (6-6)
I don’t expect a sharp rebound all the way back to the elite after last season’s fall from grace. Not without an experienced QB. Dantonio is a good coach, though. But like others, I’m wondering if last season was just a mulligan or has the Dantonio era reached its peak.

5) - INDIANA- (2-7) (5-7)
A new coach in Bloomington. He sounds serious and receives credit for last season’s dramatically improved Hoosiers defense. Nine defensive starters return and a talented starting QB returns. I think the Hoosiers will be a tough out, but I don’t see ‘em knocking off any of the big boys.

6) - RUTGERS- (2-7) (4-8)
Adding Jerry Kill to the staff is a big plus. I’ve got the Scarlet Knights winning one or two more conference games than most of the experts are predicting, mostly for that reason.

7) - MARYLAND- (1-8) (3-9)
I’m always skeptical of transfer QBs. The experts call for better from the Terps based on signs of improvement last season. Those signs aren’t so obvious to me. Last season’s team got spanked when up against quality competition. I just don’t see many wins on a tough schedule.



WEST
1) - WISCONSIN- (8-1) (11-1)
I think this team was as good as any in the conference last season and most all of the starters are back. The schedule is kind, too. Yet another new DC is a concern, but otherwise, I see this team in the playoff discussion deep into the season.

2) - MINNESOTA- (5-4) (8-4)
New HC P.J. Fleck comes in highly touted. And the Gophers have been very competitive lately. I’m seeing some losses in the road games on the schedule.

3) - NORTHWESTERN- (5-4) (7-5)       
Many are projecting Northwestern to make a serious run at the Western Division title. Maybe; they have a lot of returning starters. Contrary to many of the experts, I’m not completely sold on QB Clayton Thorson, though.

4) - NEBRASKA- (5-4) (7-5)
New QB, new DC, but I’m expecting more of the same from the Mike Riley era. Good, but not great.

5) - IOWA- (4-5) (6-6)
New QB, new OC, and same Kirk Ferentz. Throughout the years, Iowa (and Northwestern) has been one of the most difficult teams to figure out. You never know with this program.

6) - PURDUE- (4-5) (5-7)
I thought Purdue showed signs during the last tenure and even the tenure before. Played hard, just poorly coached. The new guy is supposed to be good, and I like QB David Blough. I expect significant improvement from the Boilermakers.

7) - ILLINOIS- (2-7) (3-9)
I know they say it takes three years, but I still think the first season is a good indicator. HC Lovie Smith’s first season?...not so good. I actually do expect some improvement. Nothing that will show up in the win-loss record, though.