What constitutes a “play”?
Any game where the predicted
point spread differentiates from the Las Vegas point spread by seven or more
points. It’s a system that I like to use. I believe you’re just flipping coins
if your number isn’t much different than the closing line. A seven point
cushion provides needed protection against the random bounces of the football
(and the officiating).
Example 1: If the closing
line is Michigan by 4 and I predict Nebraska to win by 3 or more, then Nebraska
qualifies as a play (the team I would wager on). If my prediction is Nebraska
by 2 or less, then it’s not a play.
Example 2: If the closing
line is Michigan by 22 and I predict Michigan to beat Nebraska by only 15 or
less, then Michigan’s opponent, Nebraska, qualifies as a play.
Example 3: If the closing
line is Michigan by 8 and I predict Michigan by 15 or more, then Michigan
qualifies as a play.
What are “FTC” dollars?
Gambling on football is
illegal where I live and also where the contestants live. So we’re playing for
From The Couch, or “FTC”, dollars.
How are the FTC dollar totals calculated?
50 FTC dollars are wagered on
each game that qualifies as a “play”. The house charges 10% juice for losing
selections. So every correct play earns 50 FTC dollars while every incorrect
play loses 55.
Explanation of ATS Standings and Stats section:
At the beginning of each
season I Google “big ten football week 1 predictions" and try to find reporters/ bloggers/ analysts,
-whatever you want to call them- that offer predicted scores for all Big Ten
games. I compare the weekly (conference games only) predictions of these
professionals along with my own predictions and maintain a ranking of our
performances throughout the year. But since most avid college football fans can
correctly predict the winner about 75% of the time, I make things more
challenging by comparing the predictions ATS. The results and rankings are
broken down into five categories. (The final standings from last season are
listed under the “ATS Stats 2014” tab at the top of my posts.) The only category
that really matters as it pertains to this website’s “ATS” project is the
“play” category, which I’ve explained above. Here is how I’ve defined the
“play” category in the past:
PLAYS- I’m not promoting any type of illegal
activity here but if you happened to be in a Las Vegas sports bar you might
want to reconsider making a “play” on a game where your number varies from the
spread by only a few points. I think a seven point or more differential should
instill a reasonable amount of confidence. This category tracks such instances.
I’m still not promoting any
illegal activity, but I am going to be direct in stating that the predictions
that fall under this category are the ones that I would wager on if I lived in
Vegas. That’s the system. Seven points or more differential, play it; less than
seven, back off. So the comparisons in the “play” category will be ranked by
who does the best financially. But since I don’t live in Vegas and can’t afford
a weekly plane ticket to get there, and none of my chosen competitors live in
Vegas, we’ll have to use “funny” money. You know, pretend type monopoly
dollars. I’ll call them FTC dollars. The
“play” category standings will be featured in the “ATS” section of my posts as
the only one that matters in terms of winning this little contest of mine. The
other categories will be considered as statistical analysis and therefore will be
listed under the “Stats” heading. The categories under the stats section are
explained below the standings.
In order to maintain a level
playing field of competition, I’ll be comparing only the conference games
because I won’t be predicting any non-conference games, although my chosen
competitors will. And I am the only one who steps outside of the conference by
predicting Notre Dame games (except for week 1). I’ll list my Notre Dame
results separately.
My current overall record -
posted below my opening comments - combines my “plays” from the Notre Dame
games and the conference games.
My method is to make my
predictions on Sunday, before I look at the spreads, to keep from being
influenced subconsciously. As far as I know, none of the other contestants do
this. Therefore I make one disclaimer: If a report comes out during the week
(after Sunday) that there is an issue involving the starting quarterback (an
injury I might not have known about) or the coach (health issues, scandal,
etc.), I won’t count the game.
Occasionally I might predict a tie, which is the equivalent of a “pick
em”.
No comments:
Post a Comment