INDEX BY TITLE
I live in the Midwest which is Big Ten country. Once conference play starts virtually every Big Ten game is televised in my region and I commit myself to try and watch all of them. I have three televisions set up as some games are being played at the same time. I have no bias or affiliation to any Big Ten team as I am a lifelong Notre Dame fan (I include ND games in my viewing schedule as well). My comments and reports are qualified only by my love of the game and an extreme commitment to watching and following Big Ten football.
Sunday, August 26, 2018
Monday, January 8, 2018
SEASON IN REVIEW
The Big Ten was shut out of
the national playoffs, and under the current system I have no argument against
that. I may have an argument with the current system (leaving the teams’ fates
in the hands of a group of self-absorbed panelists who actually believe their “eye
test” is an accurate barometer to determine the best teams in the country), but
that’s a different matter altogether. Top to bottom, this has been the
strongest the conference has been in years in my opinion, and consequently the
teams beat up on each other just enough to leave no team undefeated. I firmly believe
three teams from the conference, while not necessarily better, are as good as
whoever may win the national championship. Strong at the top, but the real
difference now is the strength at the bottom. And it starts with the coaches.
Gone are the Darrel Hazells and Tim Beckmans, replaced with solid coaches like
Jeff Brohm and Lovie Smith. No easy outs in this conference.
I’ve listed a comparison of
my preseason prediction vs. the actual outcome, and some comments on how my
predictions turned out and a general overview of the teams’ performances.
WEST
What I said:
7) - ILLINOIS- (2-7) (3-9)
I know they say it takes three years, but I still
think the first season is a good indicator. HC Lovie Smith’s first
season?...not so good. I actually do expect some improvement. Nothing that will
show up in the win-loss record, though.
7) - ILLINOIS- (0-9) (2-10)
I did expect a couple of
conference wins, namely against Rutgers and Indiana. But Rutgers had a nice
mid-season surge and I knew Indiana would be the better team, but figured the
Illini might steal one at home. Looks like Lovie will need all three years and
I think a third season is worth a look. Youth and injuries are the lament of
most losing teams, but I think there’s some validity to that in the Illini’s
case. I like the new RB, but he got hurt, and the new QB shows promise. This team
fought hard and was close in all but the last two games. My last couple
sentences were accurate, I think. Drastic drop off in stupid penalties from the
Beckman era, and we have to consider just how bad the Beckman era was. Still,
we’ve seen quicker turnarounds and it’s rare that a coach becomes consistently
successful after a start like this, but it is Lovie Smith. Just wonder if
recruiting isn’t a challenge for him. I’d say give him another year but if
things don’t improve it’s time to re-evaluate.
What I said:
2) - MINNESOTA- (5-4) (8-4)
New HC P.J. Fleck comes in highly touted. And the
Gophers have been very competitive lately. I’m seeing some losses in the road
games on the schedule.
6) - MINNESOTA- (2-7) (5-7)
The Gophers lost their road
games and then some, dropping them to a distant sixth place finish as opposed
to the three way tie I predicted. This wasn’t a terrible football team; I don’t
think any team in the Big Ten was. So with a competitive conference, the record
looks worse than the reality. Still, I figured this program to maintain the mid
to upper level division status that was established under the Jerry Kill
regime. But coaching changes can mean a step back in the first season, so a
mulligan is certainly warranted. This team will need a QB. I’m a bit wishy-washy
in my opinion of HC P.J. Fleck. I think he deserves more time, and although I
can’t put my finger on exactly why I feel this way, I have a feeling Fleck may
be in over his head. But that’s just a hunch. Next season will be telling.
What I said:
4) - NEBRASKA- (5-4) (7-5)
New QB, new DC, but I’m expecting more of the same
from the Mike Riley era. Good, but not great.
5) - NEBRASKA- (3-6) (4-8)
The Mike Riley era is finally
over after three seasons. It’s well
documented on this blog that I’ve been expecting this since not too long after
Riley was hired. I overestimated their finish a bit – I wasn’t really sure if a
new QB would help the Riley/Nebraska situation. It didn’t. An early season loss
to Northern Illinois exposed the Huskers as a subpar team, by any standards,
let alone the high standards established in Lincoln. Consequently, I was able
to cash in a few times wagering against the Huskers. We’ll have to see if
things improve, now that Riley has been returned to from where he came,
probably feeling like this whole stint was just a bad dream. Husker fans are
counting new HC Scott Frost to end the nightmare. I don’t know too much about
Frost but I expect he’ll do better than this in his first season.
What I said:
5) - IOWA- (4-5) (6-6)
New QB, new OC, and same Kirk Ferentz. Throughout the
years, Iowa (and Northwestern) has been one of the most difficult teams to
figure out. You never know with this program.
4) - IOWA- (4-5) (7-5)
I got the conference record
right, but it was good for fourth place in the division. Typical Iowa season.
Some really great wins and some head scratching losses. Every now and again,
usually when the grumbling gets intense, Ferentz turns in an exceptionally good
season. But most of the time, this is what you’ll get. And from the couch it
appears that everyone in Iowa is fine with that. Oh, I’m sure there’s some
grumbling after a season like this, but if the standards were all that high, a
change would have been made long ago. QB Nathan Stanley was slightly above
average in first season as a starter, and shows promise to be even better next
season. I don’t really see him as ever becoming elite, though. The new OC,
Ferentz’s kid, wasn’t outstanding, but was much better than I expected
considering the nepotism. Josey Jewell was the best linebacker I’ve seen in
this conference, and RB Akrum Wadley was under-appreciated in a conference full
of good RBs. The Hawkeyes struggled in big games to get Wadley in open space,
where he is most effective.
What I said:
6) - PURDUE- (4-5) (5-7)
I thought Purdue showed signs during the last tenure
and even the tenure before. Played hard, just poorly coached. The new guy is
supposed to be good, and I like QB David Blough. I expect significant
improvement from the Boilermakers.
3) - PURDUE- (4-5) (6-6)
The significant improvement I
expected came to fruition. In fact, I feel pretty good about how the season
played out compared to my preseason take. I knew it. This team could be good
with decent coaching. I had my finger on the pulse of this team all season,
save a mid-season dip when the Boilermakers lost to Rutgers and Nebraska. The
dual QB system in this case seemed like a good idea, and it paid off when
Blough went down with an injury. In stepped a very experienced and capable
Elijah Sindelar. I’m not a big fan of QBs sharing time, but there’s something
to be said for it when you consider there’s a good chance, probably better than
most would guess, that the QB is going to be injured at some point in the
season. I cashed in on this team a few times, and should have cashed in a few
more times.
What I said:
3) - NORTHWESTERN- (5-4) (7-5)
Many are projecting Northwestern to make a serious run
at the Western Division title. Maybe; they have a lot of returning starters.
Contrary to many of the experts, I’m not completely sold on QB Clayton Thorson,
though.
2) - NORTHWESTERN- (7-2) (9-3)
I had my “I told you so”
ready after the early season blowout loss to Duke. But the Wildcats finished
much better than I projected. No shame in losing to Wisconsin and Penn St., and
the Wildcats ran the table from there. Always have to have a head scratching
loss in there, often times early in the season. Northwestern was never on
Wisconsin’s level, though, so a serious run at the division title was never a
consideration. Overall, I’d say Thorson did better than I expected, although
some of my complaints about him would come to fruition. Just not as often. I
compare HC Pat Fitzgerald to Iowa’s Kirk Ferentz. Both are long tenured because
they do just good enough to keep their job, but not good enough for anyone to lure
them away. Every good season, such as this, seems to have a strange loss, and
every not so good season, such as Iowa’s, seems to have a big win in there.
What I said:
1) - WISCONSIN- (8-1) (11-1)
I think this team was as good as any in the conference
last season and most all of the starters are back. The schedule is kind, too.
Yet another new DC is a concern, but otherwise, I see this team in the playoff
discussion deep into the season.
1) - WISCONSIN- (9-0) (12-0)
It’s difficult for any team
to go undefeated, so I figured the Badgers would stumble somewhere along the
way. Aside from that, I think I can put my preseason prediction for Wisconsin
in the “I told you so” category. Well, me and probably several others. But while
most of the preseason publications I was reading may have had Wisconsin at or
near the top of the division, none of them seemed to think the Badgers were
going to be quite as successful as I was predicting with the late season
playoff discussion. And Wisconsin may have made the playoffs with a little bit
better play out of QB Alex Hornibrook in the championship game. Don’t get me
wrong, Hornibrook didn’t play terrible, but he needed to play one of his best
games and he didn’t. And am I the only one wondering where was Jonathon Taylor
in the second half? He wasn’t even on the field during some key possessions.
Heck, I thought he must’ve been hurt there for a while.
EAST
What I said:
5) - INDIANA- (2-7) (5-7)
A new coach in Bloomington. He sounds serious and
receives credit for last season’s dramatically improved Hoosiers defense. Nine
defensive starters return and a talented starting QB returns. I think the
Hoosiers will be a tough out, but I don’t see ‘em knocking off any of the big
boys.
7) - INDIANA- (2-7) (5-7)
The Hoosiers were in just
about every game, but didn’t knock off any of the big boys. The new coach is
dedicated and, for better or worse, emotional. QB Richard Lagow suffered a
mid-season swoon and was benched for either injury or performance, I’m not sure
which, but really the Hoosiers were a decent team in a conference that, top to
bottom, is the most competitive it’s been in some time. This is one of the best
last place teams the conference has had in years.
What I said:
7) - MARYLAND- (1-8) (3-9)
I’m always skeptical of transfer QBs. The experts call
for better from the Terps based on signs of improvement last season. Those
signs aren’t so obvious to me. Last season’s team got spanked when up against
quality competition. I just don’t see many wins on a tough schedule.
6) - MARYLAND- (2-7) (4-8)
Maryland turned some heads
right out of the gates with a season opening upset over Texas. The transfer QB
I was skeptical of eventually played, but started the season third on the depth
chart as Maryland lost two QBs to injury. This team had some impressive playmakers
on offense, and actually wasn’t all that bad. But from the couch it appeared
there were times during the season when this team would quit when things
weren’t going well. That could account for how the Terps faded down the
stretch, but we can’t dismiss the tough schedule I mentioned in my prediction.
What I said:
6) - RUTGERS- (2-7) (4-8)
Adding Jerry Kill to the staff is a big plus. I’ve got
the Scarlet Knights winning one or two more conference games than most of the
experts are predicting, mostly for that reason.
5) - RUTGERS- (3-6) (4-8)
Rutgers did come up with a
couple of unexpected conference wins, although I’m not sure how much Kill had
to do with that. Kill just retired amid reports that he relapsed into his
health issues during the season. The Scarlet Knights put together a mid-season
run winning three of four conference games, which immediately turned the season
into a success by recent standards. After that, it seem as though this team was
content to rest on that success as they closed the season with three losses by
a combined margin of 13 – 116.
What I said:
3) - MICHIGAN- (6-3) (9-3)
The Wolverines lost a lot of starters, but hey, it’s
Michigan. That means something now that Harbaugh is in charge. It wouldn’t
surprise me if Michigan does better than I’m projecting, but it wouldn’t take
long to find the three tough spots I’m seeing on the schedule.
4) - MICHIGAN- (5-4) (8-4)
Michigan lost one more game than I predicted,
against Michigan St. This team struggled at the QB position. Wilton Speight was
injured early in the season, but really wasn’t playing well at all before he
got hurt. John O’Korn struggled as well as the replacement. Freshman Brandon
Peters was inserted late in the season and his play had me and I’m assuming
others wondering why he wasn’t inserted earlier in the season. Eventually
Peters was injured, but his brief stint left him appearing to be the future QB
for the Wolves. Speight saw the handwriting and has recently transferred. Too
bad the offense struggled so much, the defense was very good.
What I said:
2) - PENN ST- (6-3) (8-4)
The reigning champs have a lot returning and
consequently, large expectations. I’m not completely sold, though. I love QB
Trace McSorley, the kids a winner. Has a lot of swagger. Maybe too much. I know
he’s a junior but I’m a expecting a bit of a sophomore jinx from him and most
of the team. They’ll be good, just not as good as they might think they are.
3) - PENN ST- (7-2) (10-2)
Penn St. turned in a better
record but finished lower in the division than I predicted. It took me a long
time to warm up to HC James Franklin, but I have to give the man credit. He’s
got this program back on track. I didn’t find this team to be overconfident at
all, and they weren’t too far from going undefeated and playing for the
conference championship. The loss to Michigan St. was a tough spot coming off a
heartbreaking one point loss to Ohio St. in the most hyped regular season
conference game of the season. Don’t want to take anything away from Sparty,
but the outcome may have been different if Michigan St. fell on any other date
on the schedule.
What I said:
4) - MICHIGAN ST- (4-5) (6-6)
I don’t expect a sharp rebound all the way back to the
elite after last season’s fall from grace. Not without an experienced QB.
Dantonio is a good coach, though. But like others, I’m wondering if last season
was just a mulligan or has the Dantonio era reached its peak.
2) - MICHIGAN ST- (7-2) (9-3)
We got our answer concerning
Dantonio. The man hasn’t lost his touch at all. I was dead wrong—the Spartans
turned things around in a big way. Well, at least in the won-loss column. And
that’s all that really matters, right? I wouldn’t call this a dominating team,
many of the wins against like opponents were by very thin margins. And a couple
of the losses, Notre Dame and Ohio St., were blowouts. Still, have to hand it
to Dantonio and the whole Spartan program.
What I said:
1) - OHIO ST- (9-0) (12-0)
I thought new OC Kevin Wilson was overrated as a Head
Coach. Nothing overrated about his offense, though. I mean, the man ran an
offense that could put up points against anybody while he was at Indiana.
Giving him access to the talent that parades through Columbus just isn’t fair.
1) - OHIO ST- (8-1) (10-2)
The Buckeyes weren’t as
dominant as I thought they’d be, especially on offense. Wilson’s impact wasn’t
near as apparent as I expected, and at one point during the season reports of
tension between HC Urban Meyer and Wilson surfaced. The Buckeyes were good
enough to compete with any of the teams in the national playoffs, but with two
losses probably should not have been invited. The loss to Iowa was a dagger,
but much of that has to be chalked up to a letdown after a big “showdown”
against Penn St. the week before.
Previous posts:
Monday, November 27, 2017
BIG TEN FOOTBALL FTC WHAT HAPPENED WEEK 13
I went 3-0 last weekend. A strong
finish brought me close to .500 for this season. The 0-4 start killed me. My
predictions and pre-game comments can be found on my previous post, dated 11-22
(ATS Predictions - Week 13).
My Current Overall Record: 9-10
THE PLAYS
Iowa 56
Nebraska 14
Closing Line: Iowa -3.5
FTC Prediction: Iowa 34 Nebraska 17
My ATS Pick: Iowa -3.5
Result: Win
Sometimes when I see such a
discrepancy in my prediction and the Vegas line I become suspicious that I’ve
overlooked something. If anything, I thought my predicted spread of 17 points
might’ve been a little tight, and mentioned in my prediction write-up that this
could be a blowout. It was.
Northwestern 42
Illinois 7
Closing Line: Northwestern -16.5
FTC Prediction: Northwestern 38 Illinois 14
My ATS Pick: Northwestern -16.5
Result: Win
I wasn’t too far off with my
final score prediction. Northwestern wasn’t flat at all.
Ohio St. 31
Michigan 20
Closing Line: Ohio St. -12.5
FTC Prediction: Ohio St. 17 Michigan 13
My ATS Pick: Michigan +12.5
Result: Win
For a while there I thought
Michigan was going to pull off the upset. But Michigan QB John O’Korn just
isn’t made for high pressure situations. A critical interception late in the
game made me have to sweat this one out.
THE NON-PLAYS
Purdue 31
Indiana 24
Closing Line: Purdue -2.5
FTC Prediction: Purdue 17 Indiana 11
My ATS Pick: Pass
I had a strong feeling
Saturday morning that Purdue was going to win this game and considered forcing
a play. But I kept my discipline and didn’t. Would have paid off if I had. My
predicted point spread was close to exact, but there was more scoring than I
figured. Good game, but Purdue was undoubtedly the better team this day.
Michigan St. 40
Rutgers 7
Closing Line: Michigan St. -13.5
FTC Prediction: Michigan St. 23 Rutgers 7
My ATS Pick: Pass
I mentioned a blowout in my
prediction write up and that’s what we got here. I expected a better effort out
of Rutgers at home.
Penn St. 66
Maryland 3
Closing Line: Penn St. -22.5
FTC Prediction: Penn St. 35 Maryland 17
My ATS Pick: Pass
I don’t particularly like
that they switched this game to rivalry week. I liked it better when Penn St.
closed the season with Michigan St. and Maryland closed with Rutgers. Those
games were two nice matchups more conducive to becoming a rivalry in my opinion.
Wisconsin 31
Minnesota 0
Closing Line: Wisconsin -17.5
FTC Prediction: Wisconsin 31 Minnesota 7
My ATS Pick: Pass
This is another game I almost
forced. The line slipped out a half point beyond my “play” requirements and
again, I kept my discipline. Almost hit the score exactly.
Previous posts:
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
BIG TEN FOOTBALL PREDICTIONS WEEK 13
I’ll be making predictions on
all conference games and using them for the purpose of trying to select winners
vs. the Vegas point spread. There are seven games to look at this week.
My current record: 6-10
As is the case with most folks who don’t live in
Vegas, I won’t know the point spread that’s available to me until game day,
which will essentially be the closing line. So I’ll have to wait until then to
see if I get the number I need to make a play (wager). At the bottom of my
write-ups, I submit the number I’ll need to make a play, and how that number
compares to the current line.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
NEBRASKA
|
7
|
7
|
10
|
17
|
|
IOWA
|
14
|
17
|
24
|
34
|
I’m a little torn on this
one. I can see Iowa blowing the Huskers out, but the Hawkeyes have been playing
so poorly since the big win over Ohio St. And the game is at Lincoln, Nebraska
QB Tanner Lee - as erratic as he is - can make some nice throws, and while this
Nebraska program has pretty much been off track since about two games ago, I
can see the Huskers rallying for one last game at home and probably the last
game for their Head Coach. Emotional advantage Nebraska, I think. Still, I have
to consider that poor Nebraska defense. All considered, this is the number I’ve
come up with.
As of now, Iowa
is favored by 3.5 points, so I’ll be taking Iowa.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
PURDUE
|
0
|
7
|
14
|
17
|
|
INDIANA
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
11
|
Love this matchup. Rivalry
game between two lower tier teams with a bowl game on the line. Both teams are
embarking on a new beginning with a new HC. I figure it’ll be intense. Which
often times translates into a defensive battle. I like the Boilermakers,
figuring a slight advantage for home field and another slight edge to the
Purdue coaching staff.
As of now, Purdue
is favored by 2.5 points. I would need a point or more to take Purdue, so I’ll
most likely be passing on this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
RUTGERS
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
|
MICHIGAN ST
|
3
|
13
|
20
|
23
|
This is another game that
could be a blowout but I’m tempering that notion. I don’t figure the Spartans
to be all that inspired, and QB Brian Lewerke is currently in “bad Brian” mode.
Rutgers, on the other hand, is playing its last game of the season at home, and
would probably be inspired to play well as their last performance was
embarrassingly bad.
As of now, Michigan
St. is favored by 13.5 points, which is pretty close to how I see it, so I’ll
most likely be passing on this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
ILLINOIS
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
14
|
|
NORTHWEST'RN
|
0
|
21
|
21
|
38
|
This is a nice rivalry game,
but there’s too much of a discrepancy in talent/confidence in this game.
Northwestern might be a little flat, but it won’t matter.
As of now, Northwestern
is favored by 16.5 points. If this number is 17 or lower on Saturday, I’ll take
Northwestern.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
MARYLAND
|
7
|
7
|
17
|
17
|
|
PENN ST
|
7
|
21
|
28
|
35
|
I guess they’re trying to
turn this into a rivalry game. Won’t be much of a rivalry until Maryland
catches up. I figure Penn St. to be a little flat, and Maryland has some decent
players, so I’ve got this one closer than most might figure.
As of now, Penn
St. is favored by 22 points. If it climbs up to 25 or more, I’ll take Maryland,
but that isn’t likely.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
MINNESOTA
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
|
WISCONSIN
|
0
|
10
|
17
|
31
|
Kind of a tuff one to
handicap. Wisconsin is bound to be flat coming off of the big win over
Michigan. And they’re already in the conference championship game.
And Minnesota probably doesn’t look like much of a challenge after the Gophers were blown out by Northwestern last Saturday. In light of all this, will a shot at the national playoffs be enough inspiration to keep a bunch of youngsters focused? Probably not. I look for Wisconsin to start slow, but as usual, wear down the opposing defense in the later part of the game.
And Minnesota probably doesn’t look like much of a challenge after the Gophers were blown out by Northwestern last Saturday. In light of all this, will a shot at the national playoffs be enough inspiration to keep a bunch of youngsters focused? Probably not. I look for Wisconsin to start slow, but as usual, wear down the opposing defense in the later part of the game.
As of now, Wisconsin
is favored by 17 points. If this number holds up or drops to a lower number, I’ll
take Wisconsin.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
MICHIGAN
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
13
|
|
OHIO ST
|
0
|
10
|
10
|
17
|
This is my favorite game to
watch. I think Michigan is better than most might think right now, and I don’t
think Ohio St. is as good as most might think right now. I’m calling for a
close one, and wouldn’t entirely rule out an upset.
As of now, Ohio
St. is favored by 11.5 points. If this number stays at 11 points or more, I’ll
take Michigan.
My method is to begin making
my predictions for the upcoming week on Sunday while Saturday’s games are still
fresh in my mind. I don’t look at the Vegas point spreads until I’m done
handicapping all of the games. If the point spread that I predict for a
particular game differs from the closing line by seven or more points, I
consider it a “play”,—i.e. a game that I would wager on. If the difference is
less than seven points, I back off. I’ll also back off if a report comes out
during the week (after I’ve already handicapped the game) that there is an issue involving the starting
quarterback (an injury I did not know about) or the head coach (health issues,
scandal, etc.).
Previous posts:
Monday, November 20, 2017
BIG TEN FOOTBALL FTC WHAT HAPPENED WEEK 12
I went 1-0 last Saturday. My
predictions and pre-game comments can be found on my previous post, dated 11-17
(ATS Predictions - Week 12).
My Current Overall Record: 6-10
THE PLAYS
Northwestern 39
Minnesota 0
Closing Line: Northwestern -7
FTC Prediction: Northwestern 28 Minnesota 14
My ATS Pick: Northwestern -7
Result: Win
I got a much needed win here.
Wasn’t even close.
THE NON-PLAYS
Penn St. 56
Nebraska 44
Closing Line: Penn St. -25.5
FTC Prediction: Penn St. 45 Nebraska 14
My ATS Pick: Pass
Make no mistake about it,
this was a blowout. Penn St. had their backup players in on defense for most of
the second half, and gradually inserted backups on offense. I figured that
might happen, but didn’t figure Nebraska to leave its starters in for the whole
game and squeeze out every possible point.
Purdue 24 Iowa
15
Closing Line: Iowa -7
FTC Prediction: Iowa 24 Purdue 15
My ATS Pick: Pass
Nice win for the Boilermakers
here. QB Elijah Sindelar played better than I expected, his best game of the
year, I think. This loss is kind of typical of the Iowa program. Stark peaks
and valleys.
Indiana 41
Rutgers 0
Closing Line: Indiana -10.5
FTC Prediction: Indiana 24 Rutgers 20
My ATS Pick: Pass
I thought Rutgers had a
chance going into this game but they didn’t play well at all. Apparently the
Scarlet Knights feel good enough about what they’ve already accomplished this
season, which I’ll agree is more than most expected.
Michigan St. 17
Maryland 7
Closing Line: Michigan St. -15.5
FTC Prediction: Michigan St. 34 Maryland 24
My ATS Pick: Pass
I hit the point spread
exactly, but the scoring came in much lower than I figured. The weather might
have had something to do with that.
Ohio St. 52
Illinois 14
Closing Line: Ohio St. -41
FTC Prediction: Ohio St. 52 Illinois 14
My ATS Pick: Pass
Me and the oddsmakers had
this one figured out long before they kicked it off.
Wisconsin 24
Michigan 10
Closing Line: Wisconsin -7
FTC Prediction: Wisconsin 17 Michigan 9
My ATS Pick: Pass
Good game between two good
teams. Wisconsin QB Alex Hornibrook’s numbers weren’t great, but his play was.
Hornibrook threw some nice, clutch passes when he needed to. It may not be too
often that he’ll need to. Michigan lived up to its top ranked defensive status
for most of the game, but the Badgers running game wore down even this great
defense in the fourth quarter.
Previous posts:
Friday, November 17, 2017
BIG TEN FOOTBALL PREDICTIONS WEEK 12
I’ll be making predictions on
all conference games and using them for the purpose of trying to select winners
vs. the Vegas point spread. There are seven games to look at this week.
My current record: 5-10
As is the case with most folks who don’t live in
Vegas, I won’t know the point spread that’s available to me until game day,
which will essentially be the closing line. So I’ll have to wait until then to
see if I get the number I need to make a play (wager). At the bottom of my
write-ups, I submit the number I’ll need to make a play, and how that number
compares to the current line.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
OHIO ST
|
14
|
24
|
38
|
52
|
|
ILLINOIS
|
0
|
7
|
14
|
14
|
Mismatch here. And Urban
Meyer usually doesn’t take a knee towards the end of the game.
As of now, Ohio
St. is favored by 41 points, which is exactly how I see it so I’ll be passing
on this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
MICHIGAN ST
|
7
|
17
|
24
|
34
|
|
MARYLAND
|
7
|
14
|
17
|
24
|
Michigan St. came crashing
down to earth last Saturday. I thought
QB Brian Lewerke had turned a corner but he regressed badly. Now I’m not sure
what to expect. But Maryland hasn’t been all that reliable either. I’m assuming
QB Max Bortenschlager will be playing, but I don’t think that will be enough
for the Terps to get a road win.
As of now, Michigan
St. is favored by 15.5 points. I’d need 17 points or more to take Maryland, so
unless that happens Saturday morning, I’ll be passing on this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
WISCONSIN
|
7
|
7
|
14
|
17
|
|
MICHIGAN
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
9
|
This is the game that
Wisconsin surely must have had circled on what many consider to be a relatively
easy schedule. Last Saturday’s game against Iowa was a primer and the Badgers
passed with flying colors. This game should answer some questions about QB Alex
Hornibrook as many, including myself, wonder how he will hold up when forced to
make significant plays through air if the Badgers face a defense good enough to
load up the box and stop the Wisconsin running game. Michigan has that kind of
defense. But, so does Wisconsin. Michigan has been on the rise with the
insertion of Brandon Peters at QB, but Peters is young and inexperienced and
this will be the best defense he’s faced… at Camp Randall, one of the tougher
places in the conference to get a road win.
As of now, Wisconsin
is favored by 7 points, which is pretty close to how I see it so I’ll be
passing on this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
NORTHWEST'RN
|
7
|
21
|
21
|
28
|
|
MINNESOTA
|
0
|
7
|
14
|
14
|
Northwestern has been on a
roll. I keep waiting for them to turn in a clunker- history indicates that’s
what they’ll do- but it hasn’t happened. I don’t think it will happen in this
game. I hope not anyway, it looks like this game could be a play.
As of now, Northwestern
is favored by 7 points. If this number holds up or goes down, I’ll be taking
Northwestern.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
PENN ST
|
14
|
35
|
38
|
45
|
|
NEBRASKA
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
20 years ago, this would have
been a colossal matchup between two iconic programs. It’ll be nice to see the
two iconic helmets clashing on the same field, but there’s nothing colossal about
this matchup these days. I hope Nebraska someday gets back to good, but the
program is currently spiraling downward and I believe the team has just about
given up, due in large part to the handwriting on wall concerning HC Mike Riley.
Throw in the fact that Nebraska’s starting QB won’t be playing, and this game
has the makings of a blowout. It’s obvious Riley is a super nice guy, and Penn
St. HC James Franklin seems like a nice enough guy to take a little pity on
Riley near the end of the game and take his foot off the gas some.
As of now, Penn
St. is favored by 25 points. I’d take Penn St. minus 24 or less, so this might
become a play by Saturday, but as of now it is not.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
IOWA
|
3
|
17
|
24
|
24
|
|
PURDUE
|
7
|
7
|
14
|
17
|
Purdue has been my dark horse
all season, and a few weeks ago I might have called for a Purdue win here. But I’ve
kind of soured on the Boilermakers lately. I still like ‘em and still think
they have a chance to win this game, but I’m a little put off with HC Jeff
Brohm’s excessive use of trick plays. And I still don’t trust QB Elijah
Sindelar. Can’t say that I trust Iowa that much either, but they are at home
and certainly have a team good enough to win this game.
As of now, Iowa
is favored by 7 points, which is exactly how I see it so I’ll be passing on
this one.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Final
|
|
|
INDIANA
|
7
|
17
|
24
|
24
|
|
RUTGERS
|
3
|
13
|
20
|
20
|
I think Rutgers has a chance
in this game. More of a chance than the oddsmakers are giving them, anyway.
As of now, Indiana
is favored by 10.5 points. I would need 11 or more points to take Rutgers, so I’ll
have to see what number I get on Saturday.
My method is to begin making
my predictions for the upcoming week on Sunday while Saturday’s games are still
fresh in my mind. I don’t look at the Vegas point spreads until I’m done
handicapping all of the games. If the point spread that I predict for a
particular game differs from the closing line by seven or more points, I consider
it a “play”,—i.e. a game that I would wager on. If the difference is less than
seven points, I back off. I’ll also back off if a report comes out during the
week (after I’ve already handicapped the game) that there is an issue involving the starting
quarterback (an injury I did not know about) or the head coach (health issues,
scandal, etc.).
Previous posts:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)